The Future of Higher Ed Isn’t Professors vs. AI—It’s Professors with AI

The Future of Higher Ed Isn’t Professors vs. AI—It’s Professors with AI

Mother helping her son use the computer in their house's office room
Mother helping her son use the computer in their house's office room

Higher-education headlines love a cage match: human faculty on one side, generative algorithms on the other. Reality on campus looks different. Students have already voted with their keyboards, 86 percent use AI tools for coursework, and more than half do so every week (Mulford, 2025). Faculty are catching up fast: 93 percent of staff expect their own AI use to grow over the next two years, even as concerns about bias and privacy linger (Ellucian, 2024). The real question, then, is not whether AI belongs in the academy, but how it can amplify the people who make learning happen.

From Digital Noise to Human Care

Administrative overhead is the silent saboteur of teaching time. Generative AI tops the 2024 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report as a key remedy, promising to relieve faculty of repetitive grading, scheduling, and documentation so they can focus on high-impact mentoring (EDUCAUSE, 2024). Yet UNESCO warns that any deployment must remain “human-centered, transparent, and accountable” to avoid eroding trust (UNESCO, 2023).

Meet CARLA: AI That Serves the Whole Campus

CARLA (Campus AI for Resilience & Life Assistance) was designed around those twin mandates, efficiency and empathy.

  • Smart triage engine routes routine questions about deadlines, fees, or campus services to instant answers, while flagging complex or sensitive issues for a human follow-up.


  • Proactive early-alert layer scans advising notes and LMS data for indicators of academic distress or basic-needs insecurity, nudging counselors before a crisis escalates.


  • Context-aware referrals connect students to food pantries, mental-health resources, or emergency grants in minutes, mirroring the concierge model already valued in health-care AI pilots (Rackoff, Zhang, & Newman, 2025).

How CARLA Elevates Campus Roles

Stakeholder

What AI Automates

What Humans Now Reclaim

Professors

Draft rubrics, summarize discussion threads, auto-grade formative quizzes

Deeper feedback, capstone mentoring, research collaboration

Advising staff

Appointment scheduling, policy look-ups, progress-to-degree calculations

Holistic coaching, crisis intervention, career planning

Student leaders

Event promotion, roster tracking, budget requests

Peer mentoring, advocacy projects, community-building

By offloading “noise,” CARLA turns classroom and campus hours back into person-to-person engagement, the heart of higher education. Early pilots show advising response times cut in half and faculty reporting an extra five teaching hours per term (Seeds of Success internal data, 2025).

Governance Keeps Empathy in the Loop

CARLA follows a professor-with-AI governance model adopted from Ithaka S+R’s best-practice recommendations: faculty, students, and IT share decision rights on data use, model updates, and ethical guardrails (Ithaka S+R, 2025). Real-time dashboards display what CARLA answered, escalated, or declined, giving stakeholders continuous visibility and control.

Roadmap to Campus-Wide Adoption

  1. Start small: Pilot one high-volume workflow—e.g., financial-aid FAQs—to build trust.


  2. Train on local data: Fine-tune models with anonymized campus language so responses sound familiar, not generic.


  3. Measure what matters: Track educator hours reclaimed and student satisfaction, not just chat counts.


  4. Iterate openly: Hold monthly review sessions where faculty and student reps critique transcripts and refine guardrails.


Conclusion

Professors and staff are irreplaceable because learning is relational. AI like CARLA thrives when it listens for routine tasks and lifts the humans who do the caring. The future of higher ed isn’t a showdown, it’s a collaboration, where world-class pedagogy and empathetic technology work side by side to help every learner thrive.

References

Ellucian. (2024, October 12). AI survey of higher-education professionals reveals surge in adoption despite concerns around privacy and bias. https://www.ellucian.com/news/ellucians-ai-survey-higher-education-professionals-reveals-surge-ai-adoption-despite-concerns

EDUCAUSE. (2024). 2024 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Teaching and learning edition. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2024/5/2024-educause-horizon-report-teaching-and-learning-edition

Ithaka S+R. (2025, May 1). Making AI generative for higher education: Adoption and challenges among instructors and researchers. https://sr.ithaka.org/publications/making-ai-generative-for-higher-education/

Mulford, D. (2025, March 6). AI in higher education: A meta summary of recent surveys of students and faculty. Campbell Academic Technology Services. https://sites.campbell.edu/academictechnology/2025/03/06/ai-in-higher-education-a-summary-of-recent-surveys-of-students-and-faculty/

Rackoff, G. N., Zhang, Z. Z., & Newman, M. G. (2025). Chatbot-delivered mental-health support: Attitudes and utilization in a sample of U.S. college students. Digital Health, 11, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241313401

https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research